White House Intensifies Pressure on Powell Amid Fed Renovation Controversy

2025-07-12
White House Intensifies Pressure on Powell Amid Fed Renovation Controversy
The Wall Street Journal

The White House is escalating its efforts to undermine Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, leveraging a contentious renovation project at the Fed's headquarters as a key point of attack. Advisers are publicly suggesting that Powell either deliberately misled Congress regarding the scope and cost of the renovations or demonstrated a shocking lapse in oversight, leading to significant scrutiny and political pressure.

The controversy centers around a $6.3 million renovation of the Federal Reserve Board's headquarters in Washington, D.C. Republicans, and now elements within the Biden administration, have questioned the necessity and transparency surrounding the project, particularly given the Fed's mandate to combat inflation and maintain economic stability. Critics argue the spending appears tone-deaf during a period of high inflation and economic uncertainty.

The White House's strategy appears to be a calculated move to weaken Powell's standing ahead of potential policy decisions and, ultimately, his confirmation vote. Powell's term is set to expire in early 2025, and the administration faces the prospect of either supporting him for another term or seeking a replacement – a decision complicated by the ongoing debate over the Fed's independence and its role in managing the economy.

“We’re looking into the details of this renovation,” a White House official stated, speaking on background. “The American people deserve to know why the Federal Reserve, an institution tasked with safeguarding our financial system, felt it was appropriate to spend millions on non-essential upgrades while families are struggling with rising costs.”

Powell, for his part, has defended the renovations as necessary to address aging infrastructure and improve security. He testified before Congress earlier this year, stating that he was not personally involved in the approval process and that the project was deemed essential by Fed staff. However, the White House's continued focus on the issue suggests a determination to challenge that narrative.

The political implications are significant. The Fed's independence is a cornerstone of U.S. monetary policy, and any perceived interference from the White House could erode public trust and destabilize the financial markets. Republicans have already seized on the issue to criticize the Biden administration's economic policies, accusing them of attempting to politicize the Fed.

Experts warn that the White House’s actions could have unintended consequences. “While concerns about government spending are legitimate, directly attacking the Fed Chair risks undermining the institution’s credibility and potentially hindering its ability to effectively manage the economy,” said Dr. Eleanor Vance, an economist at the Brookings Institution. “The Fed needs to be free from political interference to make sound decisions based on economic data, not political pressure.”

The situation remains fluid, and the White House's strategy could evolve depending on the outcome of ongoing investigations and public reaction. However, one thing is clear: the Federal Reserve Chair is facing an unprecedented level of political scrutiny, and the future of U.S. monetary policy hangs in the balance.

下拉到底部可发现更多精彩内容