xAnts

Renowned naturalist and broadcaster Chris Packham has launched a scathing attack on a proposed government bill, branding it a “licence to destroy nature” and warning of devastating consequences for Australia’s unique biodiversity. Speaking at the prestigious 2025 Hay Festival of Literature and Arts, Packham pulled no punches in his critique, highlighting concerns that the legislation could undermine crucial conservation efforts and pave the way for further environmental degradation.

The controversy centres around the Nature Restoration Fund and its potential implementation. Packham argued that, as currently drafted, the bill fails to provide adequate safeguards for vulnerable ecosystems and could actually incentivise activities that harm the environment. He pointed to the potential for loopholes to be exploited by developers and industries seeking to profit at the expense of natural habitats.

“This isn’t about hindering progress or stifling economic growth,” Packham asserted. “It’s about recognising that a healthy environment is the foundation of a prosperous society. We cannot continue to treat nature as an expendable resource. This bill, as it stands, sends a deeply worrying message – that short-term economic gains are valued above the long-term health of our planet.”

The Hay Festival Setting & Audience Reaction

The Hay Festival, known for its vibrant discussions on literature, science, and current affairs, provided a powerful platform for Packham's message. The audience, comprised of a diverse group of writers, academics, and environmentally conscious citizens, responded with a mixture of concern and anger. Questions from the floor focused on the specifics of the bill, the potential impact on endangered species, and the role of public pressure in influencing government policy.

Packham emphasised the importance of collective action, urging individuals to contact their elected representatives and demand greater environmental protections. He also highlighted the role of citizen science initiatives in monitoring environmental changes and holding authorities accountable.

Concerns Beyond the Fund

While the Nature Restoration Fund was the primary focus of Packham’s critique, he also touched upon broader concerns about the government’s environmental record. He cited examples of deforestation, habitat loss, and the decline of native wildlife populations as evidence of a systemic failure to prioritise environmental sustainability.

“We’re facing a biodiversity crisis of unprecedented proportions,” Packham warned. “Australia is one of the most biologically diverse countries on Earth, yet we are losing species at an alarming rate. This bill represents a dangerous step backwards in our efforts to protect this incredible natural heritage.”

What Now?

Packham’s comments have ignited a renewed debate about the government’s approach to environmental policy. Environmental groups are calling for a complete overhaul of the bill, demanding stronger protections for vulnerable ecosystems and a greater emphasis on sustainable development. The coming weeks are likely to see increased scrutiny of the legislation and intensified pressure on the government to address the concerns raised by Packham and others. The future of Australia's natural heritage may well hang in the balance.