Car Finance Redress Scheme Faces Fierce Opposition: Industry Body Calls it 'Impractical'

2025-08-04
Car Finance Redress Scheme Faces Fierce Opposition: Industry Body Calls it 'Impractical'
BBC

Australia's car finance industry is pushing back hard against the proposed redress scheme designed to compensate consumers who were mis-sold car loans. The Finance Brokers Association of Australia (FBAA), representing a significant portion of the industry, has labelled the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) plan as “completely impractical” and potentially crippling to businesses.

The proposed scheme aims to address widespread concerns about historical car finance sales practices, where consumers were allegedly charged unaffordable interest rates or fees, and weren't adequately informed about their loan obligations. While the industry acknowledges that past issues existed, the FBAA argues that the current proposal fails to consider the complexities of the car finance market and could lead to unintended consequences.

Key Concerns Raised by the FBAA:

  • Cost and Funding: The FBAA estimates the redress scheme could cost billions of dollars, raising serious questions about who will bear the financial burden. They argue that forcing lenders to shoulder the entire cost could stifle lending and reduce access to finance for consumers.
  • Scope and Eligibility: The criteria for eligibility for redress are perceived as overly broad, potentially leading to a flood of claims from consumers who may not have suffered significant financial loss. This could overwhelm the system and delay payouts for those who genuinely deserve compensation.
  • Operational Challenges: Implementing a scheme of this scale presents significant logistical challenges. The FBAA highlights the difficulty of accurately assessing historical sales practices and determining appropriate redress amounts, especially given the passage of time and changes in lending regulations.
  • Impact on Brokers: The FBAA also expresses concern about the impact on brokers, who play a vital role in connecting consumers with lenders. They fear that the scheme could lead to increased scrutiny and regulatory burdens, potentially driving brokers out of the market.

Industry Calls for a Collaborative Approach

Instead of the current proposal, the FBAA is advocating for a more collaborative approach, involving industry stakeholders, consumer groups, and the FCA to develop a workable solution. They suggest exploring alternative models, such as a levy-funded scheme or a more targeted approach focusing on the most egregious cases of mis-selling.

“We are not advocating for a free pass for past mistakes,” stated Dermot Greene, CEO of the FBAA. “However, we believe that the proposed scheme, in its current form, is simply not sustainable and will ultimately harm both consumers and the industry. A more pragmatic and collaborative approach is needed to ensure a fair and effective outcome for everyone involved.”

The debate over the car finance redress scheme is likely to continue in the coming months, with the FCA expected to consider feedback from industry stakeholders before finalizing its plans. The outcome will have significant implications for the future of car finance in Australia, impacting lenders, brokers, and consumers alike. The industry’s strong opposition underscores the complexity of the issue and the need for a carefully considered solution that balances the interests of all parties involved.

What does this mean for consumers? Consumers who believe they may have been mis-sold a car finance loan should continue to seek advice from financial advisors and legal professionals. The final details of the redress scheme will determine the process for submitting claims and the potential for receiving compensation.

Recommendations
Recommendations